QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Read the record question by question.
Short answers are attributed to the relevant document, party position or judgment, with links for further checking.
01What is the parcel discussed on this site?+
SHM No. 5/Lemo, approximately 87,100 m² in Lemo, in the area now forming part of Tokyo Riverside PIK 2.
02What records support the Sumita Chandra chain?+
The principal non-judicial records include Deed No. 38/1988, the registered certificate, PBB records, the 2016 and 2023 land-status checks, and the inheritance-tax record.
03What grounds did PT MBM rely on?+
Case materials refer to the location permit, Decision No. 596/Pid.S/1993/PN.TNG, Power of Attorney No. 11 dated 9 March 2015 from The Pit Nio’s heirs to Nono Sampono/PT MBM, and SHGB No. 502/Lemo issued in 2023. According to PT MBM counsel’s argument, the deeds from The Pit Nio to Chairil and from Chairil to Sumita were void by operation of law because of Decision 596. That statement is presented here as PT MBM’s litigation position.
04What document was alleged to be false?+
The criminal case centred on Attachment 13 in the BPN inheritance title-transfer application, especially the statement concerning physical possession of the site.
05Where can the source documents be checked?+
Use the chronology, ownership-evidence, court-decision, hearing and archive pages linked below.
Continue reading